Every AI answer about you, cross-examined against its own sources.

In 2025 a Google AI Overview told searchers that a Minnesota solar installer was being sued by the state Attorney General. It wasn't. The answer cited four sources, and none of them contained the claim. The company reported losing a $150,000 contract.
Google corrected that answer, which is the point: generative answers change underneath you, so this has to be measured continuously, not checked once.
AI-visibility tools track whether a brand is mentioned and with what sentiment. None check whether the cited sources actually support the sentence they're attached to.
Generative answers diverge across regions, and a company can't see what searchers in other markets are shown. So location is treated as a variable.
Google often hides AI Overviews on adverse queries. Grounds records that as a measurement instead of an error.
Paywalled or blocked sources get UNVERIFIABLE, which is excluded from scoring.
Docket, deposition, cross-examination, dossier. The metaphor tells you what the tool does before you read a line of docs.
Only claims counted against the entity are red. Grounded is black, excluded is grey.
It's designed to be saved as a PDF and handed to someone, so it reads top-down like a report.
Screens from the live site and the recorded Wolf River Electric dossier.




